The Comparative Study on the Effect of Using Vocabulary Self-collection and Semantic Mapping Strategies on Students’ Reading Comprehension The Vocabulary Self-collection and Semantic Mapping Strategies on Students’ Reading Comprehension
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study compared and examined the effects of vocabulary self-collection strategies and semantic mapping strategies on first-grade students at SMK N 1 Pangkalan Kerinci's reading comprehension skills. All of the SMK N 1 Pangkalan Kerinci first-year students made up the research's population. Two classes were picked for cluster random sampling: X1 Networking Computer Technique (28 students) served as experimental group 1 and X Accounting Major (28 students) served as experimental group 2. Using SPSS 21 version, the paired sample t-test and independent sample t-test formulas were applied to the data analysis. The results of the data analysis demonstrate that students' reading comprehension of narrative texts is significantly improved when they use vocabulary self-collection. With df 27 in significance levels of 5% and 1%, To is -6,669 more than Tt (2.06<-6,669>2, 79). Moreover, it is evident that the probability, or Sig. (2-tailed), is 0.000 less than 0.05 (0.000<0.05). Next, employing the Semantic Mapping Strategy has a noteworthy impact on an experimental group of students' reading comprehension of narrative texts. 2. With df 27 in significance levels of 5% and 1%, to is -10,708, which is more than tt (2.06<-10,708>2,79). Moreover, it is evident that the probability, or Sig. (2-tailed), is 0.000 less than 0.05 (0.000<0.05). That indicates that Ha is accepted and Ho is denied. The students in experimental group 2 can enhance their reading comprehension in narrative texts by 29,1%, according to the percentage of significant effect between the pre-test and post-test of the experimental class, as determined by checking for the effect size or eta-squared. Thus, it can be said that using the Semantic Map approach is superior to the Vocabulary Self-collection approach.
Keyword: Reading comprehension, vocabulary self Collection, semantic mapping
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Adi Pranata, Mohammad Sofyan. (2019). The Teaching of Reading in Senior Secondary School. International Journal of English Education and Linguistics
Agus Rohmat Hidayat,N.Alifah.2022. Reading for Students in English Language Education Programs. International jurnal of Social Healt
Alderman, M.Key. 2004. Motivation for Achievement. Possibilities for Teaching and Learning. (Mahwah: Laurence Erlbaum Associates. Inc
Al-Mu’tassim (2014) The Impact of Using Explicit/Implicit Vocabulary Teaching Strategies on Improving Students’ Vocabulary and Reading Comprehension.
Anderson, N.2003. Reading: Practical English Language Teaching. New York: McGraw Hill.
Antonacci, P.A. & O’Callaghan, C.M. (2011). Developing Content Area Literacy: 40 Strategies for Middle and Secondary Classrooms. United States: SAGE Publication.
Arifuddin Hamra. 2012. A Model of Reading Teaching for University EFL Students: Need Analysis and Model Design. English Language Teaching. Vol 5 No. 10. Canadian Center of Science and Education.
Benyamin, Herman et al, (2010). Advance English Learning 2. Bandung. Grafindo
Bos, C.S. & Vaughn, S. (2002). Strategies for teaching students with learning and behavior problems. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Creswell, John W. (2009). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. London: Sage Publication, Inc.
Elizabeth S. Pang. (2003). Teaching Reading. IAE Educational Practices Series University of Illinois at Chicago
Gay, L.R. (2000). Educational Research Competencies for Analysis and Application. New Jersey: Menril Publishing Company.
Gibgons. P. 1991. Learning to Learn in a Second Language. New York: Heinemann.
Haggard, M. R. (1982). The vocabulary self-selection strategy: An active approach toward learning. Journal of Reading, 26, 203–207.
Hague, S.A. (1987). "Vocabulary Instruction: What L2 can learn from L1". Foreign Language AnnalsVo. 20, No. 3.
Harmer, Jeremy. 2001. How to Teach English. Edinburgh: Longman.
Jhonson, Andrew P.2008. “Teaching Reading and Writing: A Guidebook for Tutoring and Tutoring and Remediating Students”. New York: Roman and Littlefield Education.
Johnson, D.O. & Pearson,P.O.(1978). Teaching Reading Vocabulary-First Ed. NY: Holt Rinehart & Winston,
Khand, Ziauddin. 2004. Teaching Reading Skills: Problems and Suggestions. Retrieved on February2nd, 2015 from http://www.bzuedu.pk/jrlanguages/vol-2004/ziauddin-4.pdf.
King. C, and Stanley, N. 2004. Insight and Strategies for Teaching Reading. Sidney: Harcourt Brace Javanovich Group.
Knapp, Peter et al (2005). Genre, Text, and grammar. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press Ltd.
Linse, Caroline T. 2005. Practical English Language Teaching: Young Learners. New York: Mc Graw-Hill Companies Inc.
Martin, A. (2002). Essential Strategies for Teaching Vocabulary: A Brief Overview of Vocabulary Development. http://www.sagepub.com/. Accessed on November, 2nd 2014.
Mc Namara, Daniellle S. 2007. Reading Comprehension Strategies. Theory,Intervention, and Technology. New York: Laurance Erbaulm Associate.
Mikulecky, B. S. and Jeffries, L. 2005 . Advanced Reading Power. White Plains: Pearson Education, Inc
Moreillon, Judi. 2007. Collaborative Strategies for Teaching Reading Comprehension.Chicago: American Library Association.
Adi Pranata, Mohammad Sofyan. (2019). The Teaching of Reading in Senior Secondary School. International Journal of English Education and Linguistics
Munro, J. (2007). 8 areas of literacy knowledge.
http://www.educationvicgov.au/studentlearning/teachingresources/english/Downloa ded 15th October 2014.
Nunan, David. 2003. Practical English Language Teaching. New York. Mcgraw-Hill Company Inc.
Rasmujiatun, Endang. 2007. A Study on Effectiveness of the Three-Phase Technique In Teaching Reading Comprehension to Seventh Grade Students of SMP N 7 Tuban in the 2006/2007 Academic Year retieved on 11th November, 2013. Fromhttp://docs.google.com/file/d/1gt2MApIfQ9z8Cu51AEaQwv0CXZDbC88uKekHMmJACAjvs3Af4DBGxkKdBhx/edit?usp=drive_web&urp=http://ejournal.unirow.ac. id/ojs/ index.php/karyail&pli=1
Richard, Jack C. 2002. Curicullum Development in Language Teaching. New York.Cambridge University Press.
Ruddell, M.R.,& Shearer,B.A. (2002). “Extraordinary,” “tremendous,” “exhilarating,” “magnifi cent”: Middle school at-risk students become avid word learners with the Vocabulary Self-Collection Strategy (VSS). Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 45, 352–363
Safitri Noor Fatonah (2015). Using Vocabulary Self-collection Strategy (VSS) to Improve Reading Comprehension of the Seventh Grade Students of SMPN 4 Kalasan in the Academic Year 2014/2015
Scoot G. Paris and Steven A. Stahl. Children’s Reading Comprehension and Assessment. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. 2005. P.134
Silabus Kurikulum 13 Bahasa Inggris Kelas X SMK N 1 Pangkalan Kerinci
Sokmen, A. (1997). Current trends in teaching second language vocabulary. In N. Schmitt & M, Michael (Ed.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 237-257). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stone, Randi. 2009. Best Practice for Teaching Reading. California: Corwin Press.
Tankersley, Karen.2003. The Threads of Reading: Strategies for Literacy Development. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Thuwaibah.(2005). The effect of semantic mapping strategy training on reading comprehension of scientific texts among matriculation students.Faculty of Language. Universitas Pendidikan Sultan Idris
Westwood, Peter.2008.What Teacher Needs to Know about Reading and Writing Difficulties. Melbourne: ACER Press
Winda Pratiwi (2012). The use Vocabulary Self-Collection Strategy (VSS) to improve students’ vocabulary mastery at the Eighth grade of SMP N 33 Purworejo in the academic year 2012/2013
Giantara, F., & Astuti, A. (2020). Kemampuan Guru Matematika Mempertahankan Substansi Materi Melalui Proses Pembelajaran Online. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 787-796.
Nahwiyah, S., Mualif, A., Haironi, R., Mailani, I., & Wismanto, W. (2023). Peran Mahasiswa Calon Guru MI/SDIT dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Baca Al-Qur’an pada Mahasiswa Prodi PGMI Universitas Muhammadiyah Riau. Journal on Education, 5(3), 9573-9583.
Mujtahid, I. M., Berlian, M., Vebrianto, R., Thahir, M., & Irawan, D. (2021). The development of digital age literacy: A case study in Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(2), 1169-1179.
Nopriyanti, W. (2020). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Di Sd Negeri 001 Pasar Baru Pangean. AL-HIKMAH (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pendidikan Agama Islam), 2(2), 184-201.
Giantara, F., Yanti, N., Handayani, S., & Anis, Y. (2020). Pola Pendidikan keluarga Saat Bencana Kabut Asap di Kota Pekanbaru. Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 4(2), 778-786.
Giantara, F. (2020). Analisis Data (Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, Metode Campuran, dan Penelitian Tindakan). Pekanbaru: LPPM STAI Diniyah Pekanbaru.
Berlian, M., Vebrianto, R., & Thahir, M. (2021). Development of Webtoon Non-Test Instrument as Education Media. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(1), 185-192.
Amiliya, R., & Giantara, F. (2021). Dampak Pandemi Covid-19 Pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. Al-Abyadh, 4(2), 116-125.
Giantara, F., & Amiliya, R. (2021). Urgensi Kebijakan Pendidikan Islam sebagai bagian dari Kebijakan Publik (Analisis Teoretis). Madania: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 11(2), 86-96.
Radeswandri, R., Budiawan, A., Vebrianto, R., & Thahir, M. (2021). Developing instrument to measure the use of online comic as educational media. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 15(1), 119-126.
Berlian, M., Mujtahid, I. M., Vebrianto, R., & Thahir, M. (2021). Profil Literasi Sains dalam Pembelajaran IPA di Era Covid-19: Studi Kasus di Universitas Terbuka. Journal of Natural Science and Integration, 4(1), 77-84.
Syahbudin, Z., Ahmad, R. R. M. R., Zein, N., & Thahir, M. (2023). Developing Students’religious Moderation Through Group Counseling at Islamic Higher Education. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 9(1), 15-28.
Amri, K., Riyantini, S., Hasri, S., & Sohiron, S. (2022). Starategi Pengembangan Mutu dan Akreditasi Di Madrasah Dalam Menghadapi Revolusi 5.0. Sustainable Jurnal Kajian Mutu Pendidikan, 5(2), 172-182.