Bioenergi dan Transformasi Sosial Ekonomi Pedesaan (Studi Kasus: Desa Lipai Bulan, Kecamatan Kerumuta, Kabupaten Pelalawan, Provinsi Riau)
Main Article Content
Abstract
Electrical energy becomes a priority for Indonesia because there are still many areas that have not been electrified especially in rural areas. Bioenergy as one of the energy fulfillment solutions for new renewable energy source becomes one of the for the development of new renewable energy in Indonesia. Oil palm, as an indigenous resource in some parts of Indonesia, can be used as a bioenergy source. Utilization of bioenergy especially for the electricity needs (biopower) can be sourced from the waste palm oil Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME). The purpose of this research is to analyze how the opportunity of POME converted to biopower can meet the electricity needs of the rural community and want to know how biopower from POME could be able to grow the economy in rural society. The research used the descriptive qualitative-quantitative method and in-depth interview. The results show that bioenergy can present an incentive to foster the dynamic movement of the rural development. By using indigenous resources in each region as a bioenergy feedstock, the government’s spirit to build Indonesia’s electric sovereignty finds a bright spot. In addition, to provide economic benefits through savings and additional people’s income, this activity is socially able to reduce conflicts due to pollution, to foster the moving forward spirit especially for the next generation, and to suppress negative externalities that were previously as the environmental responsibility.
Article Details
Section
Articles
References
[ESDM] Pusat Data dan Teknologi Informasi Kementerian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral (ESDM). 2015. Perkembangan dan penyediaan pemanfaatan migas batubara energi baru terbarukan dan listrik. Jakarta; Pusdatin ESDM.
Araujo, K. 2014. The emerging field of energy transaction; progress challenges, and opportunities. Energy research and social science (2014) 112-121.
Azzahra, F., Dharmawan, A.H., Pandjaitan, N.K. 2017. Perempuan dan Resiliensi Nafkah Rumahtangga Petani Sawit: Analisis Dampak Ekspansi Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit di Provinsi Jambi. Sodality Vol 03 No 03.
Bhattacharyya, S.C. 2013. Rural Electrification Through Decentralized Off Grid Systems in Developing Country. Springer-Verlag London.
Buchholz, T., Luzadis, V.A., Volk, T.A. 2009. Sustainability criteria for bioenergy systems: results from an expert survey. Journal of cleaner production 17 S86-S98.
Coleman M.D., Stanturf, J.A. 2006. Biomass feedstock production systems: economic and environmental benefits. Biomass and Bioenergy 30 693-695.
Dharmawan A.H, Nuva, Amalia, R., Sudaryanti, D. 2016. Isu relevan kebijakan bioenergi dalam mendukung ketahanan dan kemandirian energi di Indonesia: state of the art. Working Paper No. 4/2016. Pusat Studi Pembangunan Pertanian dan Pedesaan, Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Energy Procedia 74 (2015) 1289-1297.
Harihastuti, N. 2015. Potensi Air Limbah Industri Kelapa Sawit (CPO) Sebagai Sumber Bioenergi Terbarukan. Semninar Nasional Pangan Lokal, Bisnis, dan Eko-Industri.
Hite, D., Duffy, P., Bransby, D., Slaton, C. 2008. Consumer Willingnes-to-pay for biopower; Results from Focus Groups. Biomass and Bioenergy 32 (2008) 11-17.
Jeffers, F.R., Jacobson J.J., Searcy M.E. 2013. Dynamic on Analysis of Policy Drivers for Bioenergy Commodity Markets. Energy Policy 52 (2013) 249 – 263.
Kaygusuz, K. (2011). Energy services and energy poverty for sustainable rural development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2): 936-947.
Kleinschmidt, J. 2007. Biofueling Rural Development: Making the Case for Linking Biofuel Production to Rural Revitalization. Policy Brief No. 5. Carsey Institute, University of New Hampshire, Durham.
Kumar, A., Flynn, P., Sokhansanj, S. 2007. Power Generation from Mountain Pine Infested Wood in Canada: An Economical Opportunity for Greenhouse Gas Mitigation. Renewable Energy 33 (2008) 1354 – 1363.
Mohtasham, D. 2015. Review Article- Renewable Energies.
Nazir, M. 2005. Metode Penelitian. Ghalia Indonesia.
Park, S.H., Jung, W.J., Kim, T.W., Lee, S.Y.T. 2015. Can renewable energy replace nuclear power in Korea? An
Thahir, M. Telaa Surat Lukman Menurut Quraish Shihab: Memahami Konsep Pendidikan Karakter dalam Islam. Al-Fikra: Jurnal Ilmiah Keislaman, 22(2), 199-222.
Vebrianto, R., Hermita, N., Irawan, D., Mujtahid, I. M., & Thahir, M. (2024). Teachers' experiences in sekolah penggerak program: a retrospective case study. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 18(1), 79-88.
Iskandar, E., Rahmadan, A. A., Andini, C. P., & Thahir, M. (2023). Strengthening the knowledge of PAUD teachers about character education through living values education in Bengkalis Regency. Dinamisia: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 7(6), 1779-1793.
Thahir, M., Hitami, M., & Zaitun, Z. (2023). Shaping Resilient Futures: The Effect of PAI-Based Anti-Drug Learning Devices in Riau Province's Junior High Schools. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(4), 4736-4746.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Electrical energy becomes a priority for Indonesia because there are still many areas that have not been electrified especially in rural areas. Bioenergy as one of the energy fulfillment solutions for new renewable energy source becomes one of the for the development of new renewable energy in Indonesia. Oil palm, as an indigenous resource in some parts of Indonesia, can be used as a bioenergy source. Utilization of bioenergy especially for the electricity needs (biopower) can be sourced from the waste palm oil Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME). The purpose of this research is to analyze how the opportunity of POME converted to biopower can meet the electricity needs of the rural community and want to know how biopower from POME could be able to grow the economy in rural society. The research used the descriptive qualitative-quantitative method and in-depth interview. The results show that bioenergy can present an incentive to foster the dynamic movement of the rural development. By using indigenous resources in each region as a bioenergy feedstock, the government’s spirit to build Indonesia’s electric sovereignty finds a bright spot. In addition, to provide economic benefits through savings and additional people’s income, this activity is socially able to reduce conflicts due to pollution, to foster the moving forward spirit especially for the next generation, and to suppress negative externalities that were previously as the environmental responsibility.
Article Details
References
[ESDM] Pusat Data dan Teknologi Informasi Kementerian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral (ESDM). 2015. Perkembangan dan penyediaan pemanfaatan migas batubara energi baru terbarukan dan listrik. Jakarta; Pusdatin ESDM.
Araujo, K. 2014. The emerging field of energy transaction; progress challenges, and opportunities. Energy research and social science (2014) 112-121.
Azzahra, F., Dharmawan, A.H., Pandjaitan, N.K. 2017. Perempuan dan Resiliensi Nafkah Rumahtangga Petani Sawit: Analisis Dampak Ekspansi Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit di Provinsi Jambi. Sodality Vol 03 No 03.
Bhattacharyya, S.C. 2013. Rural Electrification Through Decentralized Off Grid Systems in Developing Country. Springer-Verlag London.
Buchholz, T., Luzadis, V.A., Volk, T.A. 2009. Sustainability criteria for bioenergy systems: results from an expert survey. Journal of cleaner production 17 S86-S98.
Coleman M.D., Stanturf, J.A. 2006. Biomass feedstock production systems: economic and environmental benefits. Biomass and Bioenergy 30 693-695.
Dharmawan A.H, Nuva, Amalia, R., Sudaryanti, D. 2016. Isu relevan kebijakan bioenergi dalam mendukung ketahanan dan kemandirian energi di Indonesia: state of the art. Working Paper No. 4/2016. Pusat Studi Pembangunan Pertanian dan Pedesaan, Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Energy Procedia 74 (2015) 1289-1297.
Harihastuti, N. 2015. Potensi Air Limbah Industri Kelapa Sawit (CPO) Sebagai Sumber Bioenergi Terbarukan. Semninar Nasional Pangan Lokal, Bisnis, dan Eko-Industri.
Hite, D., Duffy, P., Bransby, D., Slaton, C. 2008. Consumer Willingnes-to-pay for biopower; Results from Focus Groups. Biomass and Bioenergy 32 (2008) 11-17.
Jeffers, F.R., Jacobson J.J., Searcy M.E. 2013. Dynamic on Analysis of Policy Drivers for Bioenergy Commodity Markets. Energy Policy 52 (2013) 249 – 263.
Kaygusuz, K. (2011). Energy services and energy poverty for sustainable rural development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2): 936-947.
Kleinschmidt, J. 2007. Biofueling Rural Development: Making the Case for Linking Biofuel Production to Rural Revitalization. Policy Brief No. 5. Carsey Institute, University of New Hampshire, Durham.
Kumar, A., Flynn, P., Sokhansanj, S. 2007. Power Generation from Mountain Pine Infested Wood in Canada: An Economical Opportunity for Greenhouse Gas Mitigation. Renewable Energy 33 (2008) 1354 – 1363.
Mohtasham, D. 2015. Review Article- Renewable Energies.
Nazir, M. 2005. Metode Penelitian. Ghalia Indonesia.
Park, S.H., Jung, W.J., Kim, T.W., Lee, S.Y.T. 2015. Can renewable energy replace nuclear power in Korea? An
Thahir, M. Telaa Surat Lukman Menurut Quraish Shihab: Memahami Konsep Pendidikan Karakter dalam Islam. Al-Fikra: Jurnal Ilmiah Keislaman, 22(2), 199-222.
Vebrianto, R., Hermita, N., Irawan, D., Mujtahid, I. M., & Thahir, M. (2024). Teachers' experiences in sekolah penggerak program: a retrospective case study. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 18(1), 79-88.
Iskandar, E., Rahmadan, A. A., Andini, C. P., & Thahir, M. (2023). Strengthening the knowledge of PAUD teachers about character education through living values education in Bengkalis Regency. Dinamisia: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 7(6), 1779-1793.
Thahir, M., Hitami, M., & Zaitun, Z. (2023). Shaping Resilient Futures: The Effect of PAI-Based Anti-Drug Learning Devices in Riau Province's Junior High Schools. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(4), 4736-4746.